Court flip-flop gave bribery case impunity
A GROUP of Panama opinion leaders have denounced a ruling handed down by the Supreme Court which let suspects off the hook because time had run out for the investigation.
On April 6 the Court declared null part of the investigation of former Minister of Security , José Raúl Mulino and Alejandro Garuz, for alleged peculation in the purchase of radars in 2010.
In a public statement, the intellectuals said that the ruling is diametrically opposed to a ruling issued on March 3, 2016, in which the Court concluded that exceeding exceeded the period for investigating does not invalidate the case.
“If the Courts of Justice continue with the practice of denying prosecutors requests to extend the period of investigation in cases … the final result of such a practice will be none other than that of impunity”.
said a “public statement” by the group of including constitutionalists, businessmen, doctors and diplomats, among others, who agreed with the words of José Ugaz, President of Transparency International, in expressing his “support and solidarity with the Attorney General [KeniaPorcell] and all the courageous anticorruption prosecutors that work in the Public Ministry “.
The signatories of the “public statement question the” diametrically opposed view “of the nine judges of the Court in a signed judgment of March 3, 2016 on sanctions when prosecutors are overdue in the times
“It is obvious, then, that after that decision prosecutors acting under the umbrella of the Court, they could not understand that their investigation would be void ” the statement said.
They indicate that in the April 6, decision that annulled part of the process of Jose Raul Mulino for presumed peculation in the purchase of 19 radars from Selex, “the same Court, with the signatures of the same magistrates, except for the magistrate Jerónimo Mejía [who eluded his legal obligation to fail] adopted a criterion diametrically opposed, saying that all the actions that the prosecution has carried out after the deadline to investigate were absolutely nil. “
“We sincerely do not believe that the Court ignores the grave consequences of its
strange decision. The consequences were foreseeable: the acquittal of all people involved in bribes, overcharges, and other crimes diligently investigated by the Public Ministry. We share the conviction that Panamanian society will not be able to digest the serious consequences, “said the statement signed by: Carlos Bolivar Pedreschi, Mario Galindo, Juan Planells, Fernando Berguido, Guillermo Sánchez Borbón, Luis Moreno, I. Roberto Eisenmann, Alfredo Castillero Calvo, Ricardo Alberto Arias, Ramón Ricardo Arias, José Chen Barría, Juan Antonio Tejada, Rodrigo Eisenmann, Carlos Lucas Lopez, Fernando Aparicio, Jaime Arias, Olimpo Sáez, Lisímaco López, Daniel Pichel, Aurelio Barría, Tomás Herrera, Octavio Del Moral and Julio Linares.